AI coding tools are undoubtedly great at this stage. I agree that for simpler tasks, like spinning up a simple website, they are a fantastic genuine time saver that lets you get a decent product running without needing a deep technical understanding. However, this is where the conversation about "vibe coding" needs a reality check in my opinion. Vibe coding, which is essentially using natural language prompts to have AI generate the bulk of an application or wbesite, runs into serious problems when projects increase in complexity.
The Debugging Nightmare
You hit a critical issue when 90% of a complex application's code is AI-generated, and you haven't taken the time to truly understand the language or framework, making even a small change can become a massive headache.
As of the 24th of November 2025 and in my exprience AI is excellent at pattern recognition but often lacks the holistic project context and architectural understanding a human developer would have. This leads to generated code that might be syntactically correct but fundamentally misaligned with the existing system, creating subtle, hard to find bugs.
AI generated code introduces unique bug patterns like hallucinated APIs (referencing non-existent libraries or methods) or security vulnerabilities that pass functional tests. Without deep language knowledge, tracing these errors can take significantly longer than if you had written the code yourself. Personally, having started coding before this AI boom, I have strong foundational knowledge. Knowing precisely where and why an error is occurring in your own code is a skill that saves immense amounts of time and consequently, money.
Direct Costs
Many of the advanced AI coding tools, especially the CLI (Command Line Interface) agents, operate on subscription tiers or usage based pricing. While an individual's monthly fee might seem small, these costs can scale rapidly, especially in team or enterprise environments or even complexity of project (tokens)
- Subscription Fees: Many professional tools charge for access, with higher tiers offering more usage or features.
- Usage Fees: Tools using a pay per request or per line of code model can lead to unpredictable monthly expenses when used heavily, particularly during debugging or large scale generation.
Technical Debt
The more significant financial impact, however, is the technical debt accumulated by unreviewed, poorly understood AI code. Code generated solely for "the vibes" often:
- Lack Consistency: It may not adhere to project specific coding standards or best practices, making it messy and difficult for future developers (or even you) to maintain.
- Increases Maintenance Costs: When the underlying logic is unclear, every future feature, modification, or bug fix becomes a reverse-engineering challenge, costing more time and requiring more senior level expertise.
Conclusion: A Tool, Not a Replacement
Ultimately, AI is a powerful tool for accelerating the boring, repetitive parts of development and for quickly building simple prototypes. But for any **complex, production-grade application**, the value of the developer lies in **actually understanding the underlying code and architectural decisions, not relying on AI for core logic**. A strong foundation in the language is what allows you to effectively guide the AI, spot its errors, and ensure the long-term health, security, and maintainability of the codebase.
As the mobile first world continues to grow, a mobile app could be the key to unlocking your startup’s potential.